logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2016.01.19 2015고단1042
사기등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the Defendants are above two years from the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In collusion with D and E, the Defendants posted false job offer advertisements on the Internet job offering job seeking site to obtain money in the name of expenses incurred in transactions by misrepresenting a real estate broker from those who wish to engage in real estate transactions, and demanded those who reported and contacted it to send a copy of the passbook with the connection account with employees, and prepared so-called so-called the so-called “Spoot passbook” to be used for committing the crime, and tried to receive and distribute the necessary expenses for real estate transactions, such as an appraisal statement, through the relevant account.

Accordingly, Defendant A prepared a passbook in the above manner, and Defendant A prepared data beesced with data collected information on real estate transactions in the daily information area, etc., and Defendant B misrepresented the staff of each real estate office with Defendant B to contact with persons who want to engage in real estate transactions in good conditions, and demanded a false appraisal statement and other necessary documents, and introduced a virtual appraisal company, and E shared their roles by demanding necessary expenses as if the appraisal company was related to the appraisal company.

Ultimately, according to the aforementioned role sharing in collusion with D, E, etc. on July 13, 2015, the Defendants demanded the victim F, who reported and contacted the false job-seeking advertisement called " recruitment of the staff of the Changwon Hospital" on the Internet job-seeking job site, to provide a resume, physical card, and card password, etc. as working conditions, and deliver one copy of the personal traffic card in the name of the victim from the victim due to the number of cargo on the same day, and following: D, Defendant B, upon contact with the victim H who caused the advertisement seeking the real estate lease transaction around July 15, 2015, demanded the victim H who caused the advertisement to receive the premium from the victim who wants to transfer the skin management room, and E misrepresentation by misrepresenting the appraisal.

arrow