logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2015.11.25 2015고단900
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In collusion with D, E, etc., the Defendant: (a) placed false job offer advertisements on the Internet job offering and seeking to obtain money in the name of documents necessary for real estate transactions from those who wish to obtain real estate transactions by misrepresenting real estate brokers; (b) prepared a so-called checkbook to be used for committing the crime by demanding those who reported and contacted the false job offer advertisements on the Internet job offering and seeking site to send a copy of the passbook with the linked account with employees; and (c) received and distributed the documents necessary for real estate transactions, such as an appraisal document

E has made so-called a passbook in the above way, and D prepared a database by collecting information on real estate transactions in the daily information sheet, etc., and made them contact with persons who want to engage in real estate transactions and demanded documents necessary for real estate transactions, such as a false appraisal report, and introduced a virtual appraisal company, and the Defendant shared their roles by demanding each of them as if they were related to the appraisal company, and demanding documents expenses.

The Defendant, in collusion with D, E, etc. on July 13, 2015, in collusion with each other, reported false job seeking advertisements, “Recruitment of F Hospital security staff” posted on the Internet job seeking site “Abacheon Bureau,” and demanded a victim G to resumes, check card, and card password, etc. as working conditions, and received one copy of the Victim G’s Gyeongnam Bank Czem Card in the name of the victim G from the victim G in the same day. On the same day, D, around July 15, 2015, contacted the victim I who caused the real estate leasing transaction with the victim I who wants to transfer the skin management room, requiring the victim I to receive premium from the victim I who wants to transfer the skin management room, and the Defendant misrepresented the appraiser to the victim I and the victim I.

arrow