1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation as to this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the court of first instance is the same as that of the court of first instance except for adding and adding some contents as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

The text of the first instance judgment from 8th 20 to 9th 1st e.g., “i., ① entering into a contract with H on June 25, 2010 to sell and purchase shares of 1,200,000 shares of I was a G holding 100% of the shares of I, and the Defendant was not a party to the said contract.” Then, the Defendant added “(No statement that the Defendant may be deemed to have sold the shares of I in the name of a person who is not a representative director of G from June 25, 2010 (Evidence No. 5) to “no content that may be deemed to have sold the shares of I”.

The 11th sentence of the first instance judgment and the 8th sentence of the first instance judgment have been leased in the same way as “the next part was used.”

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.