logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.01.27 2013고단4483
근로기준법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged was a person who conducts personal construction business in the Daejeon Dong-gu BGra 401 residential area, and was engaged in construction works on two sites, such as the Chungcheong City Dethyl ethylty site, located in C.

The Defendant had worked at the above site from October 15, 2012 to May 20, 2013, and had retired from office E’s wages of KRW 1.37 million for March 2013 and KRW 1.8 million for April 2013, the Defendant did not pay 14 days from the date of retirement, without any agreement between the parties regarding the extension of the due date.

2. The facts charged in this case are crimes falling under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act.

However, according to the records, around November 1, 2013, the prosecution of this case was instituted after the institution of the prosecution of this case, it is recognized that this court submitted a letter of revocation of complaint stating that "the injured party does not want punishment against the defendant and revoke the defendant's complaint." Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the

arrow