logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2012.10.09 2011가합14165
부당이득금반환
Text

1. The defendant,

A. Of the plaintiffs, A, B, C, D, E, and F are as shown in attached Table 2.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Under Article 16 of the former Housing Act (amended by Act No. 7959, May 24, 2006; hereinafter the same), the Defendant newly built the rental apartment in this case, after obtaining approval from the Minister of Construction and Transportation for the project plan for the construction of the publicly constructed rental apartment under Article 16 of the former Housing Act (amended by Act No. 7959, May 24, 2006; hereinafter the same), made a public announcement of the invitation of occupants after obtaining approval for the invitation of occupants from the Seongbuk-nam mayor on March 28, 2006, newly constructed the rental apartment (hereinafter the “lease apartment in this case”).

B. The Defendant, while publicly announcing the initial rental deposit and rent of this case, determined and publicly announced the initial rental deposit and monthly rent as follows. This is calculated based on the former Rental Housing Act (amended by Act No. 8015, Sept. 27, 2006; hereinafter “former Rental Housing Act”), the former Enforcement Decree of the Rental Housing Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 19975, Mar. 27, 2007; hereinafter “former Enforcement Decree of the Rental Housing Act”), the public announcement of the standard rental deposit and standard rent of the former rental housing (amended by Presidential Decree No. 2004-70, Apr. 2, 2004; hereinafter “Standard Rental Deposit Notice”) at 2004.35m25m240,500 per annum, 205m2614,500 per annum, 306,405m254,500 per annum per annum, 2014.465m245.

C. The Plaintiffs, including the conclusion of each of the instant lease agreements, are attached Form 2, 3.

arrow