logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.01.13 2015고단803
무고등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 2009, the defendant designated his attorney-at-law as a criminal defendant and filed a complaint of forging E, etc. with the Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office, but on July 2009, at the Busan District Public Prosecutor's Office's Office, the defendant requested D to file a complaint by requesting D to make a defective disposition without suspicion (Evidence) against E, and on December 2009, waived the reappeal.

After that, the Defendant designated D as a civil agent and filed a lawsuit against the Suwon District Court Branch E, etc. on March 2012, but lost the part regarding E on January 2013, which was dismissed on or around April 2014, and became final and conclusive as withdrawal of appeal around May 2014.

1. On June 2014, the Defendant, at a certified judicial scrivener office where the name in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seocho-gu is unknown, drafted a false statement of his/her false contents using a computer for the purpose of having D take disciplinary action against him/her.

The petition "D, the respondent, was selected as the defendant in civil cases and filed a lawsuit against the defendant, and the respondent from F, prevented the respondent from filing an appeal against E with his/her relative to him/her, and the lawyer G, the respondent, who is an attorney of the other party, lost the other party's lawyer (the defendant) by unsatising the side interest of the other party's attorney, and satising him/her.

“The content or facts to the effect that D’s act on behalf of the Defendant constituted a partial correction of the criminal facts in line with the substance of the authentic statement of fact that D was selected as a person who has reported his/her family regardless of the intent of the Defendant.

There was no fact that the defendant could not file an appeal with respect to a criminal complaint case that has been disposed of without suspicion, and there was no fact that the other attorney-at-law and the defendant who was the plaintiff should not lose in connection with a civil suit case.

Nevertheless, the defendant.

arrow