The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the party is that the Plaintiff is also the history of the D religious organization E church located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si (hereinafter “instant church”).

The Defendant was a person who was the chairperson of the committee for promotion of the normalization of the instant church and was sentenced to two years of suspension from office on December 15, 2017 by the F Trial Committee established under the instant church, and was sentenced to the leave on February 4, 2018.

B. The Defendant’s criminal complaint against the Plaintiff and as a result, the Defendant filed a criminal complaint against the Plaintiff four times as follows, and all of the complaints were issued a non-guilty disposition (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the instant complaint”). 1) The Defendant, in collusion with G on October 10, 2017, in collusion with the Plaintiff against the Plaintiff on the third floor of the instant church around September 12:40, 2017, in which the recording function installed on the third floor of the instant church, including the Defendant and the Plaintiff, was recorded on eight members of the third floor of the church including the Plaintiff, thereby making it possible for the Defendant to create a white seat.

The Prosecutor of the Suwon District Public Prosecutor’s Office (No. 2017 type No. 101392) filed a complaint for a violation of the Communications Secret Protection Act by recording and listening to the contents of other persons’ conversations that are not open to the public (Evidence). On February 22, 2018, the Prosecutor of the Suwon District Public Prosecutor’s Office did not have suspicion (Evidence).

2) On or around April 10, 2018, the Defendant provided the Plaintiff with CCTV images taken by the Defendant’s personal information beyond the scope of the purpose of collection without the consent of the Defendant who is the subject of information. On or around November 15, 2017, the Plaintiff knowingly provided the said images for unlawful purposes and submitted them to the police as evidence of the accusation case, and filed a complaint against the Defendant for violation of the Personal Information Protection Act (No. 26025 of the Suwon District Prosecutor’s Office 2018 type No. 26025 of the Suwon District Prosecutor’s Office). Accordingly, the Prosecutor of the Suwon District Prosecutor’s Office rendered a disposition without suspicion (Evidence) on October 30, 2018.

3) The defendant.