beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person who operates “C” and “D” (hereinafter “each of the instant companies”) as an engineering company that conducts basic research projects related to fishery resources formation projects.
A person wishing to operate an engineering company shall meet the requirements such as the possession of technical manpower and report to the Engineering Association. However, although the defendant borrowed the name of engineering engineer E, etc. and reported it falsely as if the above E, etc. were employed by each company of this case, although there was no fact that the company had employed the engineering engineer E, etc., the defendant, etc., who was the defendant, followed the false report as if the above E, etc. were employed by each company of this case, and the company of this case was a company with normal technical manpower and the above technical manpower had been in mind to conclude the service contract by deceiving the person in charge of the service business.
1. Fraud;
A. On May 12, 2015, the Defendant, in relation to the F-2014 F-2014 survey service, submitted to the Victim a proposal stating that 16 technical personnel, such as the Defendant’s report certificate, E (specific class technician), and G (second class technician), participate in the F-2014 project, at a place where it is impossible to identify the light place, and at a place where it is publicly announced by the Victim, 16 technical personnel, such as the Defendant’s report certificate of engineering business operators, E (specific class technician), and the above technical personnel’s degree certificate, etc., were submitted to the Victim.
In the evaluation of proposals for participating companies, the victim corporation assessed the number of technical personnel by 25 points out of the total point 80 points, 10 points in the implementation plan (such as the composition of human resources for the performance of the task), 15 points in the implementation method (such as the appropriateness and feasibility of the performance of the task).
However, the defendant participates in the 1 service business of this case.