logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.12.09 2013고단1379
강제추행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Around August 2012, the Defendant was aware of the Victim B (age 51) through a marriage information company, and was able to commit an indecent act against his/her female on or around August 20, 2012.

On August 24, 2012, the defendant committed the crime on August 24, 2012, around 13:00, the second floor of the D Museum in Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, pushed the body of the victim and pushed the female into the victim's body, cutting the hand to the upper right of the victim's upper right, cutting the hand into the victim's upper right of the victim's upper right, cutting the hand into the victim's upper right of the victim's panty, cutting the hand into the part under the part of the victim's body, and putting the victim into the part above the part of the victim's panty, and the victim was under the influence of the knife of the knife sound.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

B. On September 2, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around September 13, 2012, around September 2, 2012, 2012, 13:00, the Defendant was seated with the victim of the FF department store A in YY-gu, YY-si; and (b) was able to write down the bucks of women with the clothes of the victim himself/herself.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

2. We examine the judgment. The case is a crime falling under Article 298 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon a victim's complaint under Article 306 of the former Criminal Act (wholly amended by Act No. 11574, Dec. 18, 2012). According to the records, on November 20, 2013, which was after the public prosecution of this case was instituted, a statement of revocation of complaint that the victim revoked the complaint against the defendant can be acknowledged to have been submitted to this court. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow