1. The defendant is about KRW 237,195,128 to the plaintiff A, KRW 2,00,000 to the plaintiff B, and KRW 1,00,000 to the plaintiff C and each of the above money.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The plaintiff A is based on the following facts:

The victim of the accident described in paragraph (1), the plaintiff Eul's spouse, the plaintiff Eul's spouse, and the plaintiff C are their children, and the defendant is the insurer who has acquired the automobile comprehensive insurance to compensate for the damage caused by the operation of the non-party D (Driver E, hereinafter "the vehicle driver of this case").

On July 12, 2012, at around 18:40, the driver of the instant vehicle driven his/her own car (hereinafter “Defendant”) on the road near the Synju-gun, Jin-gun, Jinju-gun (hereinafter “instant road”). While the vehicle was green at the direction of each straight distance of the Plaintiff’s bicycle and the Defendant’s side vehicle, such as a map on the scene of the accident, the driver of the instant vehicle was shocked in the direction of each straight distance of the Plaintiff’s bicycle and the Defendant’s side, but the driver of the instant vehicle was driving on the left side of the Defendant’s side, and was shocked by the Plaintiff A (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

2. Not less than a detailed pedestrian or movement.

3. Detailed unexplosion and paralysis;

4. He suffered injury, such as “Before it was made due to the nature and mental cause.”

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without a partial dispute, Gap 1 to 3 evidence, Eul 1 evidence (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the driver of the instant vehicle is a driver driving the vehicle, and the driver must observe the traffic signal, and the driver should carefully look at the front side and drive the vehicle, but at the same time turn to the left. Thus, the Defendant, the insurer of the instant vehicle, is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident.

On the other hand, the defendant did not comply with the plaintiff A's use of a bicycle road or the crosswalk landing from a bicycle through a crossing in a safe way, such as cutting off the crosswalk, and completed almost left turn on the main road adjacent to the three-lane main road.