beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff A, KRW 759,002,202, and KRW 5,000,000 for each of the said money and each of the said money to Plaintiff B and C, respectively.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. Facts of recognition 1) The Defendant is a D Ethical sports vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).
2) On September 20, 2013, E driven the Defendant’s vehicle at a speed of 41 to 50km from September 20, 2013, while driving the Defendant vehicle at a speed of 60km/h from the speed of f.m. to the f.m., at the speed of 21 to 30km, the speed of f.m. to the f.m., from the f. to the f.m. at the speed of f.m. and the front part of the front part of the Defendant vehicle and the front part of the front part of the Defendant vehicle, which driven the Defendant vehicle at a speed of 41 to 50km by driving the f.m. on the f. at the direction of the f.m. and the front part of the Defendant vehicle.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). At the time, Plaintiff A was in the first grade of high school, and Plaintiff A was driving the said Oral Ba without a driver’s license without wearing all safety caps while driving friendly G on the back of the back.
(Plaintiff A was exposed to driving without a license even around January 27, 2013) due to the instant accident, Plaintiff A suffered from the upper parts of the light water, the removal of the bones, the removal of the vertebranes, and the verte of the bones of vertebrate, etc. (4) Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A.
5) On the other hand, the Defendant agreed to KRW 5 million with Dongman G. [The grounds for recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 8 through 11, Eul's evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 7, 8, 10, fact inquiry results with the Seoul District Police Agency, the purport of the entire pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings.
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiff A, etc. due to the accident of this case as an insurer.
C. Although limiting liability, the error of E, which attempted to turn to the left unreasonably without due care to the movement of the vehicle that proceeds from the opposite part of the vehicle, is large, the Plaintiff A also did not wear the safety cap in the accident circumstances prior to the accident and without the driver's license.