(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.11.30 2015고단1415

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.11.30 2015고단1415

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a vehicle in C. C.

On September 21, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol of 0.186% with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.186% on September 21, 2015, and led the road to the intersection of gold-dong, which is located on the southwest-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, to the new interest-free plane from the south-do.

The Defendant, due to the negligence that was unable to properly operate the front-time and the operation of the operation of the operation system at the time, was driven by the victim D (W, 29 years of age) who was parked in the front-time in the signal air at the front-time, as part of the front-time driver for the Defendant’s driving of the vehicle. The Defendant, due to the shock of the foregoing EK5 vehicle, was driving by the victim F (F, 22 years of age) who was driving in front of the EK5 vehicle.

Accordingly, the Defendant caused the victim D’s injury, such as brain dust, which requires the victim D’s treatment for about two weeks in the above occupational negligence, and caused the victim H (the victim H (the 28-year old age) (the passenger) to suffer from the catum finites, which requires the victim’s treatment for about two weeks, and caused the victim FF to suffer from the victim I (the 3-year old passenger) cat finites, which requires the victim’s treatment for about two weeks. At the same time, the victim I (the 33-year old passenger) suffered from the catum finites requiring the victim’s treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, the above E-V passenger car is equivalent to KRW 1,031,450, and the above G5 car is damaged to repair cost, KRW 395,960, and did not immediately stop and take necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and H;

1. A written statement;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, investigation reports, and internal investigation reports;

1. A report on the state of the operation of a motor vehicle;

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations to H, D, I, and F

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting the crime; and

참조조문

-도로교통법

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.04.22 2014고단1793

-광주지방법원 2014.11.19 2014고단3870

-부산지방법원 2014.09.19 2014고단5594

-광주지방법원 2015.01.29 2014고단4807

-제주지방법원 2014.03.20 2014고정92