logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2013.09.13 2013고단1167
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for ten months, and for eight months, for each of the defendants C.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants’ co-principal E and Defendant A are the actual operators of “G” located in “G” in “S” in Mapopo City F. H and Defendant C are the employees managing the game site, and I and Defendant B are the employees in charge of exchange, etc. of item cards in the above game site.

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging the exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Nevertheless, from April 25, 2013 to May 5, 2013, Defendant A and B conspired with E, I, and H from May 5, 2013 to May 11, 2013, and exchanged the item card from 50 game machine to 9,000 won per sheet.

2. On May 11, 2013, Defendant A, as an actual operator of the trade name “G” in F at the time of Sinpo City, the Defendant controlled the police on suspicion that money exchange was made in the said game site, and, on the other hand, Defendant A expressed that he would make a false confession to be an actual operator of the said game site on behalf of the Defendant, and had the J make a false confession to the actual operator of the said game site.

Accordingly, on July 1, 2013, the J made a false confession that he/she had ordered the said game room to exchange as an actual operator after being investigated into violation of the Act on Promotion of Game Industry by the Yeongdeungpo Police Station, and was detained on July 8, 2013.

As such, the Defendant got J to make a false confession at the police station, thereby instigating the criminal escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The second three-time suspect examination protocol to J and the second prosecutor's examination protocol to E;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of I to the prosecution (including the E-statement), the suspect interrogation protocol of H to the prosecution, and the second suspect interrogation protocol of H to the prosecution (including the I's statement protocol);

1. Part I and H of the prosecutor’s statement concerning Defendant B

1. Each statement K and L;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. On-site reports (M and telephone communications);

arrow