logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.07.28 2014고단4925
사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반
Text

Defendant

A, B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, respectively.

provided, however, that Defendant E, F,.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is an operator operating an unauthorized game room in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City. Defendant B is a person who manages the money exchange and game room as the head of the business of the above game room, Defendant C is an employee in charge of the preparation of the closing place of the above game room and the guidance for customers, Defendant D is an employee who transports customers using J Costex Track to the game room, Defendant E is an employee who plays the role of transferring customers to the above J Costex Baz, Defendant F is an employee who is in charge of cleaning and exchanging the game room using L5 cars around the above game room. Defendant F is an employee who is in charge of cleaning and exchanging the above game room.

From May 17, 2014 to the same year

6. Until January 1, 200, Defendant A installed a total of 49 Yatoma games, which are game products, 13 Yatoma games, and 8 Yatoma games, which are game products, and provided them to unspecified customers by carrying out the said game products.

The above game work is a game product with 40,00 won, which indicates the number of customers through the digital display apparatus installed on the screen of the game machine if the number is accumulated if the game starts with the input of 10,00 won and the number written is coincided with the street or the 20,000 won, and Defendant B and Defendant G exchanged 18,000 won, which deducts 10% of commission from the customers. Defendant C and Defendant E recruited customers by telephone, Defendant D and Defendant E transport the customers to the above game site, and Defendant F used the above K5 car to prepare for the police control.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to engage in speculative activities by using speculative electronic machines.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Written statements;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

arrow