logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.06.16 2014노1532
화물자동차운수사업법위반
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A A Fine of 10,00,000 won, Defendant Limited Company B of 3,000,000 won, respectively.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal reveals that the Defendants did not obtain permission to change the number of general trucks by forging a letter of notice of permission for the trucking transport business and the alteration of the permitted matters for the trucking transport business, etc. and actually increased the number of general trucks. Therefore, the Defendants’ charges against the Defendants should be found guilty.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that acquitted all the Defendants is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant A is the representative director of Limited Company C (hereinafter “C”) and the actual operator of Limited Company B (hereinafter “B”) who obtained permission for trucking transport business.

On November 2, 2006, the Defendant, through a letter of notification on the change of the permit for trucking transport business (defluence and scrapping) issued in advance in the territory of the Young-gun, Young-gun, Young-gun, Young-gun, Young-gun, which had been issued through a normal procedure in order to supply the F, which is a motor vehicle figure for towing special use (tegr) to the type of scrapping column, and forged a letter of notification on the change of the permit for trucking transport business in the name of G of the Association of Trucking Transport Business (defluence and scrapping) in the form of scrapping column.

After that time, the Defendant submitted a forged notice of repair to a public official in charge of the registration of the public service center in the Young-gun, and registered F as a general truck with the restriction on supply, and actually increased the number of general trucks, etc. without obtaining permission for change, and operated trucking transport business by July 2013 without obtaining permission for change, even though 15 units of general trucks, such as general trucks, towing special vehicles, etc., such as the previous list of crimes (1), (2), and (3).

B. Defendant B, the Defendant, and the Defendant.

arrow