logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2013.01.30 2012가합201003
부당이득금
Text

1. Attached Form

2. The plaintiffs stated in the calculation table "request amount 1" stated in the same calculation table.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Korea National Housing Corporation (the defendant comprehensively succeeded to the rights and obligations of the Korea National Housing Corporation on October 1, 2009; hereinafter the same shall apply) decided to construct and lease C apartment houses in Thai City B in Thai City with approval of a housing construction project plan covering B members on December 9, 2000, and completed the construction of the above apartment 39 households (hereinafter the "the apartment of this case") around July 2004, when the construction was in progress.

B. At the time of the public announcement of the recruitment of occupants, the Defendant: (a) 5 years from the following day of the month following the month during which the initial period of designation of occupancy in the housing for sale was included; and (b) 5 years from the average price of the construction cost and the appraisal price under the Rental Housing Act; (c) in this case, the standard of calculating the pre-sale conversion price shall not exceed the amount calculated by deducting the depreciation costs during the rental period from the market price of the relevant housing calculated at the time of conversion in lots; and (d) the construction cost publicly announced that the

(c) Attached Form accordingly;

2. The Plaintiffs indicated in the calculation table concluded each lease agreement with respect to each of the households indicated in the same calculation table in the same calculation table among the instant apartment buildings.

Since then, the Defendant calculated the construction cost of the apartment in this case as stated in the “Defendant Construction Costs” column of the above calculation sheet (including 100% of the construction cost of the apartment in this case), and sent a notice to the occupants from the end of 2009 to conclude a sales contract. Accordingly, the above plaintiffs concluded each sales contract with respect to each household mentioned in the “Dongho-ho-ho” column of the same calculation sheet among the apartment in this case.

The defendant shall pay the above sales price under the above sales contract.

arrow