A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 22, 2018, at the convenience store located in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as “a sprinking sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling sprinkling s

2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant, at the above time and at the above place, took a brush, such as taking a bath and gathering gas active trees, and caused customers who were in the above convenience store to go out of the said convenience store, thereby interfering with the victim’s convenience store operation.

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above date, time, and place, and received 112 reports at the same time and place, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to the handling of 112 reports, etc. by engaging in the activities of the said E, such as nitium and impule, and by assaulting the head of the said E on one occasion of his own head.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence), Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of assaulting employees of convenience stores without any reason in the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code, obstructing their duties, and obstructing the lawful performance of official duties by police officers dispatched, is not good.

However, the defendant's age, sex, environment, and motive and means of committing a crime are considered as favorable circumstances in which he/she has no criminal records exceeding the fine.