A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 21, 2018, at around 00:30 on August 21, 2018, the Defendant of special intimidation: (a) the victim, who was seated with his/her her her her her her her son while drinking alcohol together with his/her her her her her son, brought half of the victim’s her son who was on the her son’s her son at the place where he/she was her her son; and (b) the victim was her son, which was a dangerous object on his/her her son, and thereby, threatened the victim by acting in the manner that he/she tried to get out of the back of the victim.

2. On August 21, 2018, around 01:15, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at the places indicated in paragraph (1) around 01:12, the police officer assigned to the G police box in the Gyeonggi Kimpo Police Station G police station, who was called out after receiving the said F’s 112 report, attempted to gather the He’s bat disease on his terminal, which was placed on the Defendant and his women at the horse’s own trust, and attempted to look at the h’s batch with the Defendant and his women. The Defendant batdddded the h’s bat on his hand with his hand, leading to the said H one at one time, and batoned the bat at hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers in the process of reporting 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (for facts constituting the crime under paragraph (1), the date of the second public trial);

1. Each legal statement about witness E and F;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A written statement of reference witnesses of the I;

1. Application of a set of statutes to one mobile phone CDs that obstruct the performance of official duties;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 284, 283(1) (a) of the Criminal Act (a point of special intimidation), Article 136(1) (a) (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that interference with the execution of official duties by reason of sentencing is to circumvent the legitimate exercise of public authority and to strictly punish it as an act detrimental to the function of the State’

The circumstances favorable to the defendant (the defendant is late later).