beta
Text
1. The defendant shall pay 698,750 US dollars to the plaintiff and 15% per annum from May 14, 2016 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a company that manufactures and engages in wholesale business, etc., and the Defendant is from January 1, 2010 to work as MD and business UN at the Plaintiff Company and retired from office around May 26, 2015.
B. On May 26, 2015, the Defendant prepared and sent to the Plaintiff a written statement with the following content:
(hereinafter referred to as “the instant undertaking”) . The A Co., Ltd., Ltd. and Dore Dore my in terms of research and development, and the Ammmmar and Dore Dore al., 698,750.46, 1750.46, 2000 . . . . . . . . . . .. Dore s. . . .s. .s. .s. to be called “the instant undertaking”).
1. Declaration A 26, 2015 U.S.C.C.C. 2015. Organization;
A. 2. Acknowledged and agree the amount of lost and damages suffered by A is US$698,750.46 and agree to compensate A certain amount of such lost and damages. The detail of th e compensation will be discussed and determined by me and A on or before June 10, 2015. [인정근거] 다툼이 없는 사실, 갑 제3호증의 1의 기재, 변론 전체의 취지
2. Assertion and determination
A. The party's assertion 1 did not observe the plaintiff company's internal regulations related to the purchase and sale management of the plaintiff's assertion and sold goods purchased from the supplier to the company established by the defendant and thereby causing damage to US$ 141,880 to the plaintiff company, the price received from the customer is not paid first to the supplier, and thus the plaintiff company did not pay the price for the goods, thereby making the plaintiff company liable for US$ 500,00 to the plaintiff company. The new customer's credit information management was neglected to make it impossible for the plaintiff company to recover the claim amounting to US$ 41,638, and the customer did not arbitrarily pay the price for the goods without the confirmation of the supplier. The defendant's inventory of US$ 23,406 among the inventory goods managed by the defendant was lost.