logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.12.17 2015가합536747
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant issued a warranty bond in the attached Form from the plaintiff and simultaneously issued it to the plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On November 15, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into the instant construction contract with the Defendant (hereinafter “instant first order”) and was awarded a contract for installation works of equipment supply with the content of designing, manufacturing, construction, and trial operation of the pipe valves and pumps at the judia State of Saudi Arabian (hereinafter “instant construction”).

The main contents of the above order shall be as follows:

PURCHASE ORDER DELIVERY DATE April 30, 2014 TERMS FOB All attatchments are the parts of this purchase order. If any conflicts arise between description in purchase order sheets and those in attachments of the purchase order, priority will be given to the description of purchase order sheets. 4. Price All Prices shown on this Purchase Order are fixed prices and not subject to any variation or escalation for the duration of this project unless the required conditions are changed. 5. Terms of Payment Payment will be made by the Purchaser to the Seller as per the following payment schedule and Required documents as following payments schedule; 5.4 10% of the Contract amount will be paid by T/T after Commissioning on site against Commercial Invoice, Commissioning Complete Conformation issued by eTEC, submission Final Data Book and Warranty Bond. 6. Delivery Conditions

6. 1 Dedeliverys: FOB Hamburg Port (Per INCOERS 2010);

6. 2 Deredelivery 30, 2014. 3 March 2013, 2014.13. Newly Inserted by Act No. 10541, Nov. 3, 2010; Act No. 1302, Nov. 3, 2011; Act No. 13024, Nov. 3, 2011; Act No. 15544, Nov. 4, 2005> Amended by Act No. 10637, Nov. 3, 2015>

arrow