The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant appears to have committed a crime against his mistake, and the fact that the Defendant has compensated for damages to 11 of the victims of fraud, etc. is liable for the sentencing factors that may be considered to the Defendant, or the Defendant, through the Internet goods transaction site, has repeatedly stolen the money in the name of goods from a large number of unspecified victims for a considerable period of time, has taken advantage of the friendly 3rd Card 1, has used the friendly 1, and has transferred money to the private gambling site account to acquire property profits, etc. The crime is not less complicated. Although the amount of damage caused by the crime is equivalent to approximately KRW 9,570,00,00,000, the most of the damage was not recovered, the fact that the damage was punished for the same type of crime, the fact that the Defendant committed the crime in this case during the period of probation of imprisonment due to fraud, and the Defendant’s age, sex, family environment, motive and background of the crime, the means and consequence of the crime, and the sentencing guidelines and the result of the application of the Supreme Court sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.