The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (the imprisonment of eight months, the suspension of execution of two years, the observation of protection and the community service order 120 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are favorable to the Defendant: (a) the Defendant made confessions of all of the instant crimes and reflects their depth; (b) the Defendant’s parents made efforts to recover damage by repaying the amount of damage to a considerable number of victims; (c) the Defendant has no record of crime exceeding a fine; (d) the Defendant had an opportunity to care for her own misconduct through confinement life exceeding 3 months; (e) the Defendant has yet to reach 19 years of age; and (e) the Defendant has been leading the Defendant’s parents to her own misconduct; (b) the instant crime is committed in a way favorable to the Defendant; (c) on the other hand, the Defendant has repeatedly acquired the price of goods against many unspecified victims using the Internet-oriented goods trading site for a considerable amount of time; (d) the means and methods of the instant crime are not easy; (e) the number of victims caused by the instant crime reaches 44 persons; (e) the amount of damage has not been recovered to some victims; and (e) the Defendant has been subject to punishment for the same kind of crime and improvement of social environment; (e.