logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2012.10.23 2012고단331
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

Defendant

A, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months, and one year for the crimes described in paragraph (1) of this Article.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Of the facts charged, the court does not separately determine the part of the facts charged that is not the requisite for establishing a crime and recognizes the facts charged to the extent that it does not have any actual disadvantage to the Defendants’ exercise of their defense rights.

Each kind of criminal records of the Defendants stated in each of the facts charged are different from the facts, and it is evident that Defendant D has a record of being punished by a fine of two million won due to the crime of injury is a clerical error of KRW 300,000.

Defendant

A on May 15, 2012, the Daegu District Court sentenced two years of suspension of the execution to eight months of imprisonment for the crime of injury, etc., which became final and conclusive on May 23, 2012. On June 14, 2011, Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution on August 22, 201 by imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Cheongju District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 22, 2011.

"2012 Highest31: Defendant A, B, and C

1. On May 17, 2012, the Defendants and D expressed the victim K(40 years of age) and scambling that they had no appraisal with Defendant A, etc. on the ground that they did not properly divide the profits accrued from the operation of the sidewalk at the J-si around 00:30 on May 17, 2012, and that D expressed the victim’s desire to “if the victim entered the outside of this spambe, she shall immediately take the place.” At the same time, the victim’s head head part is a dangerous object on the table, and the victim’s escape is prevented from leaving the clothes of the victim. Defendant B and C together with Defendant B were able to take the victim’s face at the time when the victim’s head spambling and spambling the victim’s face, and Defendant C spambling the victim’s face at the time of the victim’s escape and scambling the victim’s body.

In this respect.

arrow