1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 19, 2012, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term visit (C-3) sojourn status on May 19, 2012, and applied for refugee recognition to the Defendant on August 8, 2012.

B. On March 17, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be prejudicial to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

C. The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on June 9, 2014, but the said objection was dismissed on April 2, 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion is egbo's attitude as an Igbo's attitude from Nalymari's mother (Igbo).

On 193, the Plaintiff resided with Kaduna as Kaduna. At this point, the Plaintiff was asked to suspend a Domna meeting from Bokro, a Islamic armed force group, while working as Domna group, while working as Domna group.

In addition, on December 12, 2011, in order that the plaintiff did not stop the plaintiff's oral meeting, the plaintiff spreads his house with the members on February 10, 201, and on December 12, 201, three persons, including the plaintiff's member, were killed by committing an attack against the church that the plaintiff attended, and the plaintiff threatened the plaintiff to find the plaintiff's house and to kill the plaintiff.

Therefore, the instant disposition, which was taken on a different premise, is unlawful, even though the Plaintiff could be imprisoned from Boco for the reason that it was gyeast, in case of the Plaintiff’s return to Austria.

나. 관계 법령 ▣...