1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 2, 2013, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term visit (C-3) status on September 2, 2013, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on September 27, 2013.

B. On June 18, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute a case of “a well-founded fear that would be prejudicial to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

C. On July 24, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on July 24, 2014, but the said objection was dismissed on July 1, 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion is Magbo as Magbo's history from Naba State. The plaintiff's assertion is Magbo.

On around 2006, the plaintiff moved to the Ageia Northern Kao, while living as the Naodo, supported the church with money and truck and opened five slocks to the Gao.

As a result, on March 12, 2013, the Plaintiff was given a warning that the Plaintiff would not open a sleep from the steering staff of Bokro Sari, a Islamic armed group, in the course of working in Sb Gari (Sari).

In addition, on July 15, 2013, the Plaintiff’s mother and wife received an attack at Bocon, and the Defendant’s mother and wife died as an attack at Bocon around September 10, 2013.

Therefore, even though it is likely that the Plaintiff might be stuffed from Boco, on the other premise, on the ground that the Plaintiff supported a church as a gynasium and opened a slive forest, in case of the Plaintiff’s return to gynasium.