The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing, the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is against the instant crime, the fact that the Defendant agreed with the victim, etc. was subject to a fine on two occasions in favor of the Defendant, or the Defendant was subject to a fine on two occasions of drinking driving. The Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is inevitable due to the instant crime committed during the period of suspension of execution. In light of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, etc., the lower court appears to have sentenced to an adequate sentence (six months of imprisonment) at the end of mitigation of the minimum statutory penalty, taking into account the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, family environment, criminal record, and criminal record, the means and method of the instant crime,

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeals are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.