The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

In light of the fact that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the victim of the crime of injury, the health of the defendant is not good, and the defendant is divided into and reflected against the truth, the sentence of the court below (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court determined that the crime of larceny of this case constitutes the crime of larceny, which constitutes the crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes. The lower court mitigated the lower limit of the statutory punishment by taking full account of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, and appears to have determined the punishment of this case. In particular, the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes during the period of repeated larceny after the execution of imprisonment with prison labor due to habitual larceny under similar veterinary laws, and in particular, the Defendant again committed each of the instant crimes during the period of repeated larceny. Although the victim E was agreed upon with the victim E, the victim suffered relatively heavy injury in need of medical treatment for about 6 weeks. The thth th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th st st st st st st.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.