logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.05.30 2016고단2361
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person in charge of nursing B in Daejeon Pungsung-gu, and the victim C is a person in charge of nursing who works in the above hospital, and the defendant is a person in charge of nursing work in the above hospital.

1. On July 2015, the Defendant need to provide a joint and several surety to the victim to obtain a loan of KRW 12 million from the victim in the above hospital in the early police officer.

In other places, there is a 15 million won or more in other places, so it is not concerned about, and the joint and several sureties are changed."

However, the facts are that the defendant is undergoing the personal rehabilitation procedure at the time, and there was no particular income other than the monthly wage of 1.5 million won per month, so even if the victim gets a joint and several guarantee and received a loan, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay it

Nevertheless, the Defendant entered into a loan agreement of KRW 12,00,000,000,000,000,0000,0000,000,0000,000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,000,0000,0000,0000,0000,000,000,0000,000,000,000

2. On August 2015, the Defendant, at the foregoing hospital around August 2015, there is a place where “if the debt exceeds 30 million won, there is a place where the Defendant extended the loan at a low interest rate.”

Since the loan is likely to take place in the name of the inside, it is possible to receive the loan in the name of thener, and then to reconvert at a low interest rate. It will be necessary to change the name of the loan later.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the Defendant did not have a plan to change the name of the lending to the Defendant, and all of the above loans was planned to use them for personal purposes, such as living expenses, and thus, there was no intention or ability to repay them even if they were given loans under the name of the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on the same day, had the victim take a loan of KRW 3 million from the (ju) Rod Cop to the (ju), KRW 5 million from the (ju) Mad Cop to the (ju), KRW 5 million from the (ju), KRW 6.5 million from the HK Savings Bank, and KRW 14.5 million in total.

arrow