A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant raised from around April 2007 to April 2016 to the victim B and (State) C as workplace rent.

1. On January 2016, the Defendant sought to borrow money equivalent to KRW 18 million from a lending company as business funds from the victim’s (a) parking lot in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheongdong-gu, (a week) for the purpose of carrying on his/her indoor funeral business.

A false statement was made to the effect that “I will sell the land owned in one week and repay the loan and not cause any damage by taking advantage of the land inside the two months at one week of the loan.”

However, in fact, the defendant was planned to use money to repay other obligations of the defendant by lending money from the lending company, and the defendant already bears 1,500,000 won as interest per month in the status of having a debt equivalent to KRW 200,000,000,000, and the land located in the Chungcheongnam-gun, which is already owned by the defendant, was prepared for a request for auction by the existing creditors who have already established a mortgage.

On January 28, 2016, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) had the victim enter into a joint and several surety agreement with the victim; (c) 5 million won loan from the loan from the State to the Dong-U.S.; (d) 3 million won loan from the loan from the State to the State; and (d) 5 million won loan from the loan from the Large-U.S. loan from the State on January 29, 2016 (State); (b) had the victim enter into a joint and several surety agreement; and (c) did not pay the total amount of KRW 18 million in full; and (d) acquired economic benefits equivalent to the same amount.

2. On June 2016, the Defendant first used a loan of KRW 18 million with the money to the front of the apartment on the road in front of the apartment. If the Defendant lent KRW 48 million to the front of the apartment, the Defendant would first use the money to repay the loan of KRW 18 million with the money.

A false statement was made to the effect that “48 million won shall also be repaid immediately, as the state of land is about to be sold.”

However, the defendant is in accordance with Paragraph 1.