logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.12.07 2018고정1028
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On August 26, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act (compact) at the Suwon method Board, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 25, 2017.

[Criminal facts] On April 5, 2017, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath at the court of Suwon District Court No. 208 (No. 2016 after he/she appeared as a witness of the perjury case No. 611 of the Suwon District Court No. 2016 (No. 16:00) on April 5, 2017.

“I have known the question”.

The answer to “Is the witness sent to the toilet,” and the remaining three persons sent to the toilet.

“Ap. .....” to the question.

The author may know well.

was not deemed to have been aware of the existence of this section.

“The defense counsel asked for the first time when the Defendant was at the end of the pipe.”

“Inno, Ma, or Ma” for a question

“The answer was made.”

However, on February 9, 2016, the Defendant, at around 23:00, inhaled the first smoke of AB-CHMINAAA, which is a native mental medicine possessed by B, with C, D, and B, and inhaled string.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false testimony contrary to memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Copy of the record of examination of the witness in relation to the accused and C (the Suwon District Court Order 6111 in order of 2016, the Suwon District Court Order 2017No 3495 in Suwon District Court Order 2016, the Suwon District Court Order 2017No. 3495 in order to the accused), copy of the record of examination of the accused in relation to the prosecution [the case of Suwon District Court Order 2016 Gohap 302, 315 (Joint)], and copy of the record of examination of the witness in relation to D]

1. - A copy of each recording (D-A monetary content).

1. Prosecutor’s investigation report (Attachment of the case in question), - Judgment (2016 order 6111), Decision (2016 order 611), Decision (2017No. 3495) - Prosecutor’s investigation report (Attachment of the decision of the suspect A, etc.) - Three copies of the decision of the suspect A, and three copies of the relevant decision of the suspect C;

1. Photographs, records of seizure, photographs of seized articles and response to requests for appraisal;

1. Previous convictions: Criminal and investigative career data, suspects;

arrow