logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.06.27 2012고단6337
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2012 Highest 6337]

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of the C salary solid freight vehicle.

Around 17:00 on October 3, 2012, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle and proceeded at a fluorous speed in the direction of the Stak Stak Stung-dong in the direction of the Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak Stak, and the Defendant had a duty of care to drive the vehicle safely, such as accurately operating the steering gear, if he overtakes the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not accurately operate the steering gear while neglecting the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and right and the right and the right and duty

The Defendant, by occupational negligence, destroyed the car of the above 933,038 won to repair the car, but did not immediately stop the car and take measures such as aiding the victim.

2. A person who is engaged in driving of a wing-F truck in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act (unclaimed Measures after Accidents).

On October 3, 2012, at around 17:38, the Defendant continued to drive a road near the G police box located in F of the Hanam-si, Gyeonggi-do, along the one lane in the direction of the extension distance in Seoul, at the direction of Seoul. On the contrary, the Defendant went to the I city bus of the victim H(50 years old) driving in the direction of the opposite direction, and thus, the Defendant had a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle while looking at the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right are exercised.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so, and he is frank and belongs to him.

arrow