logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2013.11.26 2013고단567
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 20:50 on January 24, 2013, the Defendant driving a vehicle of approximately 2 km from the Young Jin-gun, Jin-gun, Jin-gun, Jin-gun to the front side of the Middle Kin-gun, Jin-gun, Ginnam-gun, without obtaining a driver’s license, for the vehicle of approximately 3 1 ton in the 2km section.

2. Around 20:50 on January 24, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes), violation of the Road Traffic Act (SP) and the Road Traffic Act (SP) and the Defendant has driven the string-III cargo vehicle described in paragraph (1) on the one-lane roads in front of the Maddong-gun of the Maddong-gun of the Maddong-gun of the Maddong-gun of the Maddong-gun of the Maddong-gun of the Gu Office, and

At the time, at night, the road is a narrow road of one lane bend to the right in the direction of the defendant's proceeding, and the center line is installed with yellow solid lines. In such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving the center line thoroughly and accurately manipulating the steering gear so as not to disturb the center line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the time, neglected to drive the 3 tin in the opposite state, but proceeded as the opposite state line by breaking the central line, and proceeded as the opposite state line, was driven by the victim D (hereinafter referred to as 44 years old) who was under the jurisdiction of the Gu Man-Myeon Office in the opposite state of the opposite state, while driving the 3 tin in the opposite state of the opposite state of the vehicle, was unable to avoid the E-wing-ray truck, which was driven by the victim D (hereinafter referred to as 44 years old), and received the front part of the said wing-ray truck as the front part of the said wing-III truck.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the above occupational negligence led the victim to undergo approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment and rehabilitation treatment for a period of six months to one year, and at the same time paid-in cargo amounting to KRW 2.5 million at the market price.

arrow