Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are simplified, and the victim D(42) was operated by Defendant A as the owner.

A person who works as a seafarer of E.

On September 21, 2016, around 09:40, the Defendants paid to the victims of the instant passenger ship at the port of Seogpo-si, 14, Seogpo-si, 14, Seopo-si, Seopo-si, 00-ro 72, and had a horse dispute with the victim because of the failure to receive reimbursement. Defendant A was able to live at the victim’s bat, and bat the victim’s bat and bat the victim’s bat. Defendant B also fatd the victim’s bat, and fatd the victim’s bat and fat the victim’s bat. The Defendants followed the victim’s chest and side bat.

As a result, the Defendants jointly committed damage to kidne without any open room within 6 weeks of medical treatment to the victim, and the frame of the sacrifies of the sacrifies of the sacrifies, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement with respect to D or F, D or F's statement;

1. Application of each written diagnosis and relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. According to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence, the sentencing guidelines (the mitigated area: two months to one year), and the Defendants’ age, gender, environment, circumstances, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the sentence shall be determined as indicated in the Disposition, taking into account various sentencing conditions as indicated in the argument of the instant case, including the following circumstances:

Along with the fact that the degree of injury of the victim caused by the crime of this case is significant, the criminal records of the same kind are several times for the defendant A, and the illegality of the defendant B's behavior's behavior is relatively more serious, the above defendant's failure paid by the victim who was the seafarer employed by the defendant A is disputed with the problem of receiving the return of part of the above defendant's failure, and the victim's payment of KRW 26 million is agreed.