1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 23,251,80 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from December 17, 2015 to the date of full payment.

1. The Plaintiff’s repayment of KRW 3,00,00 to the Defendant on September 13, 2012; KRW 10,000,00 on September 14, 2012; KRW 1,000,000 on January 21, 2013; KRW 1,000,000 on January 24, 2013; KRW 1,000 on February 7, 2013; KRW 00,000 on March 30, 200; KRW 00,00 on March 30, 200; KRW 2,00 on May 6, 2013; KRW 1,50,00 on June 1, 14, 2013; and KRW 30,00 on May 30, 200 on the aggregate of KRW 30,00 on the Plaintiff’s seeds sales; and

Therefore, barring special circumstances, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 23,251,80 (= KRW 10,000,000 KRW 1,000,000 KRW 1,000,000 KRW 2,500,000 KRW 2,000,0000 KRW 2,500,000 KRW 1,500,000 KRW 5,500,000 KRW 3,550,000 KRW - 200,000 KRW 3,550,000 KRW - 200,000,000 KRW 4,000,000 - 4,000,0000 KRW 4,000,0000,000 on the day following the delivery of a copy of the instant complaint to the day of full payment.

2. First of all of the judgment on the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant alleged that the Plaintiff agreed to reduce the Plaintiff’s obligation to KRW 10,000,000 between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on January 2015, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this. Therefore, this part of the Defendant’s assertion is without merit

Next, the defendant asserted that the plaintiff paid 5,000,000 won to the chief inspector of the D temple on behalf of the plaintiff, and on August 13, 2014, the plaintiff paid 2,000,000 won to the plaintiff on behalf of the chief inspector, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this, the defendant's assertion on this part is without merit.

In addition, the Defendant alleged that he paid KRW 5,000,000 to the Plaintiff on December 16, 2013. Thus, the fact that the Defendant remitted KRW 5,00,000 to the Plaintiff on December 16, 2013 does not conflict between the parties, but the said money is paid.