logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 01. 18. 선고 2016두54244 판결
(심리불속행)구 조세특례제한법 제99조의3 적용시 감면 부분 해석사항은 당연무효에 해당하지 아니함.[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2016Nu43369 ( September 13, 2016)

Title

(In the application of Article 99-3 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act, the part of the reduction or exemption shall not be deemed to be null and void a year.

Summary

(The main point of the original trial) In order for the administrative disposition to be null and void automatically, the defect must be objectively obvious because it is a serious violation of the important part of the law and regulations.

Related statutes

Restriction of Special Taxation Act Article 99-3 (Special Taxation for Transfer Income Tax on Purchasers of Newly-Built Houses)

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the allegation in the grounds of appeal by appellant is not included in the grounds provided for in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow