logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.04.24 2013고단6418
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 25, 2013, at around 23:45, the Defendant requested the victim E (the 51-year-old) (the 51-year-old) to withdraw the drinking value in his/her deposit passbook within the 2 room of "D" located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju-gu, but on the ground that the victim refused to do so, he/she saw the victim's knife the victim's knife the knife's knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on witness E’s legal statement;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. On December 21, 201, the reason for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with respect to the punishment of rape and injury by rape from the Gwangju District Court on December 21, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years and six months as of December 21, 201, and was under the suspension of execution, and inflicted injury on the victim under the influence of alcohol, shall be determined by taking into account the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, such as the circumstance in which the victim was not subject to the punishment of the Defendant, and the circumstances in which the victim shall support his/her two daughters, etc

The acquittal portion

1. The summary of this part of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant collected a beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object on the tables, seven times or more, and (b) caused the victim’s injury to the body and head of the relevant beer disease; and (c) caused the victim’s injury to the body and head of the relevant beer disease; and (d) caused the victim’s injury to the unknown part of the treatment days.

2. Although there is a fact that the Defendant was her boomed by the victim, the Defendant cited beer’s disease, which is a dangerous thing as stated in the facts charged in the instant case, and argued to the effect that there was no fact of her being injured by beer disease.

3. Determination as to whether the defendant was injured by beer's disease;

A. The charged facts of this case are as follows.

arrow