logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.09.18 2015고단2690
모욕등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 4, 2015, the Defendant was urged to return home from the victim C (the age limit 45) affiliated with the Seoul Guro-gu Police Station B District and the victim D (the age limit 26) who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report that “a person under the influence of alcohol was under the influence of alcohol” while drinking alcohol in front of the Guro-gu Seoul High School, Guro-gu, Seoul High School.

The Defendant tried to find out a warning to the victims who recommended her home home, but did not find any warning, and the Defendant solicited the victims to “I am home in the same manner as her drunk, so they do so.” The Defendant publicly insulting the victims by referring to “I am home in the same manner as her drunk was drunk,” and publicly insulting the victims “I am in the police where her friend is friend, her friend, her friend, her friend, and her friend, her friend, her friend, her friend, her friend, her friend, her friend, her friend, her friend, friend, her friend, friend, her friend, her friend,” at the place where her friend was found.

2. On the same day as Paragraph 1, at around 22:15, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender suspected of insulting C, etc., and continued to give a desire to police officers, even after he was arrested as a flagrant offender, and was going to the Guro Police Station B District Office in Guro-gu Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul, and tried to file a petition for the Defendant, and the Defendant was faced with the head of the slope F by having his cell phone f, which was flicked by the Defendant on the ground that “I will grow up by the scopic flicke, and I will see that the cell phone flick F is a slope.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the sloping F's global service.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning C, D, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on mobile phone pictures;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the Criminal Act as to the crime in question.

arrow