logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.10.19 2016고단1145
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, on June 22, 2016, appealed six months of imprisonment for fraud in the Busan District Court’s Dong Branch branch branch, and was currently serving in the appellate court at the Busan District Court at the present Busan District Court, and, as a person, contributed to the film, such as “C” as a tugboat, etc., the film distribution or the fixed income does not exist, but the amount borrowed from the bank, Capital, and branch, etc. as living expenses, etc. is equivalent to three hundred million won, and the amount borrowed from the bank, loan, etc. is equivalent to KRW 300 million, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the husband F of the victim E and the victim, who was aware of 10 million won or more, from the society, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay

1. On August 2013, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement that “F and F shall pay consolation money to all the wife in order to obtain divorce from the previous wife and to make a marriage with the previous wife.” On the prompt date, the Defendant borrowed money.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim E through the above F, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to repay the money.

After doing so, the Defendant received from the F the amount of KRW 50 million in the name of the borrowed money that F received from the victim E.

2. On January 20, 2014, the Defendant stated that “F is required to reach an agreement as a assault case. It borrowed KRW 50 million from 50 million to f. It is soon possible time to pay payment without interest.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim E through F, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to repay the money.

The Defendant, through F, received money from the victim E to the account of passbook (H) in the name of the Defendant for the purpose of borrowing money from the victim E.

3. On August 19, 2014, the Defendant called F at an infinite place and called “the monthly rent deposit is all available in the apartment where the married wife had been pregnant.”

arrow