beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On July 4, 2014, around 15:00, the Defendant intruded the structure that the victim entered into a new construction site and managed by the 1-3-dong Building, which is an employee of the said company, at the site of the construction site of the construction site of the new exhibition center of the victim C Co., Ltd., Ltd., which is located in Seojin-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, for the purpose of exercising the right of retention related to the claim for construction cost which was not received from the said company other than the instant limited liability company, via the
Defendant including this, from around that time, the same year
8. From the 15th day to the 15th day, the victim invadedd the structure managed six times as shown in Appendix I.
2. On July 4, 2014, from around 15:00 to 18:00, the Defendant interfered with the business, at the same place as paragraph (1) and where the Victim C acquired the ownership by voluntarily winning a successful bid for the above building and real estate, and did not settle the claim for the construction cost, the Defendant used a red paint at the site of the construction site of the said exhibition site for the reason that “public criminal punishment, during the exercise of the right of retention, during the removal of the said building and real estate, during the process of attracting, during the exercise of the right of retention, during the exercise of the right of retention, he installed the sand position board stating the phrase “F”, and installed the sand position board stating the phrase “the phrase “the entry of the public parts who are under construction, and prevented them from entering and leaving the construction site,” and did not obstruct the victim’s work by means of force.
Defendant including this, from around that time, the same year
8. From the 15th day to the 15th day, it interfered with the victim’s new exhibition center construction work by force over six occasions, such as the list Ⅱ attached hereto.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;