beta
Text
Defendant
B and A shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
Defendant
B or A does not pay each of the above fines.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2011 Go-si83] Defendant B and Defendant A had an awareness that apartment is subject to a public auction in the state that they did not receive the price after receiving a subcontract in the area of the mountain area, the mountain area, and the mountain area, the mountain area, the mountain area, and the mountain area.
At around 14:25 on March 15, 201, Defendants entered the site through the fence to secure the right of retention of the deposited construction cost at the G apartment construction site at the time of Gongju-si, G apartment construction site, and intruded the structures by breaking the keys of the office managed by the victim H in hand by hand.
[2012 High Court Decision 37] (Defendant B, A)
1. On March 25, 201, around 16:00, the Defendants kept the entrance door door door at the construction site and entered the said construction site office (No. 101) under the pretext of exercising the right of retention at the construction site of the said G apartment construction site managed by the victim I Co., Ltd.
Accordingly, the Defendants jointly intruded on the structure managed by the victim.
2. On April 4, 2011, the Defendants lost possession of the said construction site, and did not enter the said construction site again, and entered the said construction site at around 15:00 on April 14, 201, through the part of the pents, installed around the construction site, under the pretext of exercising the right of retention, and entered the said construction apartment 301 and 303.
Accordingly, the Defendants jointly intruded on the structure managed by the victim.
3. On April 21, 201, at around 09:50, the Defendants tried to install a security alarm device in a fixed door at the site of the construction site of the apartment complex, and the Defendants were at the age of h (39) and the entrance was set off by Defendant B, and Defendant A got off the shoulder part of the victim’s shoulder by the opening of the entrance. Defendant A, with both hands, was able to carry the victim’s left hand and ske down the victim’s left hand, and caused the victim’s injury, such as acute 14 days, which requires treatment.
Summary of Evidence
[Attachment 2011 fixed83]
1. Defendant B and A’s respective legal statements 1.