logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2014.09.24 2013가합11783
채무부존재확인
Text

1. With respect to the traffic accident described in paragraph 1 of the attached list, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff).

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff entered into an automobile insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”) between C and C with respect to the cwning D and C1 ton of freezing truck owned by C (hereinafter “instant vehicle”). The Plaintiff entered into the instant automobile insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

나. 피고 A는 2013. 7. 29. 07:30경 순천시 오천동 소재 순천만국제정원박람회 동문 출입구 앞 “ㅜ”자형 삼거리 교차로 부근에서 자신의 처 피고 B를 뒷좌석에 태우고 E 오토바이(이하 ‘이 사건 오토바이’라고 한다)를 운전하여 청암대학교 방면에서 팔마체육관 방면으로 자전거전용도로를 따라 진행하다가 위 교차로에 이르러 그대로 직진하던 중, 정원박람회장 동문 방면에서 청암대학교 방면으로 편도 3차로 중 1차로로 좌회전하고 있던 F 운전의 이 사건 차량 운전석 앞바퀴 휀다 부분 등을 이 사건 오토바이의 앞바퀴 부분으로 들이받았다

(The place where a traffic accident occurred is the intersection where the bicycle exclusive road is cut off; hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). (c)

In the instant accident, Defendant B received medical treatment due to an injury, such as brain dead, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and Defendant A received a surgery on August 9, 2013 due to an injury, such as blood under the chille, brain pressure, etc., and at the same time, undergo a surgery on September 1, 2013, and undergo a surgery on the chille surgery and the climatic removal surgery on September 1, 2013, but has not been reinstated until now.

On September 26, 2013, the Plaintiff paid 464,460 won to Defendant B, and 1,458,630 won in total to Defendant A on September 26, 2013 and September 27, 2013.

Defendant A was issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 as a result of the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents on October 8, 2013 (No. 2013 High Court Decision 201Da7489) with respect to the instant accident, and the said summary order became final and conclusive as it is.

E. The instant case.

arrow