1. The Plaintiff’s appeal as to the part of the Plaintiff’s active damages claim and the Plaintiff’s exchange change in the trial.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance except for the modification of the contents stated in the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in paragraph (2). Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The 6th and 8th of the amended part of the 5th of the 6th of the 6th of the 7th of the 6th of the 7th of the 6th of the 5th amendment "the defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the market price of each share of this case, suspension of business due to the failure of the Plaintiff to conduct the lease business, and considerable amount of taxes imposed on the Plaintiff." The 6th of the 6th of the 6th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the changing part "it is difficult to see, and it is difficult to see that the Defendant has obtained unjust enrichment," and the 7th of the 7th of the 7th changing part "the 7th of the 7th of the 7th of the 7th changes are replaced by the following contents." Even if the Defendant received rent from the lessee, the 7th of the 7th shares of this case are paid by the Defendant, regardless of the fact that the value of each share of this case includes profits from the use and exchange of each real estate.

If income accrues from the income, it shall be reported and paid, and shall not be reported and paid.