logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원(제주) 2015.10.07 2014나1289
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4

No. 5 below the 6th judgment of the first instance court, "......... the medical personnel of the defendant hospital seems to have caused damage to the deceased's left side in the course of the operation of this case" as follows: "The medical personnel of the defendant hospital damaged spine beer in the process of the operation of this case, and accordingly, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital caused damage to the deceased's left side in spine beer during the operation of this case..........., the 6th judgment of the first instance court, "It seems that the deceased died........, the 6th judgment of the court of first instance, which included the 6th judgment of the deceased's 1st instance medical treatment before the operation of this case....." No. 2 of this case, which included the 6th judgment of the court of first instance as 0th day after the above 6th day of the operation, was inserted with the following contents, and there was no possibility that the 1th day before the operation of this case had been altered.

arrow