A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around D convenience stores in the Gu of Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (b) on the roads in front of D convenience stores in the Gu of Changwon-si, and (c) on the background F of E belonging to the Jindo Police Station E in the Jindo Police Station where the Defendant was working to control drinking driving; (c) why the Defendant

The crackdown on the safety mother of a person boarding the back of the Obane shall be dint.

“I am on the left side of F which calls for sound and returning home, and am on the drinking side of F which calls for returning home.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the crackdown on drinking driving.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs photographs showing damaged parts;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Based on the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the conditions favorable to the reasons for sentencing as set forth below), the sentencing conditions set forth in the instant case, such as the age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., as set forth in the following circumstances, and the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court sentencing guidelines (the basic area of the sentencing guidelines set forth in Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Duties ( June - June 1): the scope of the recommended sentence set forth in the sentencing guidelines for the commission of sentencing of the Supreme Court.)

A favorable circumstances: The defendant has no criminal record for the same kind of crime, and there is no criminal record who has been punished more severe than a fine for the crime of this kind; the confession and the confession of his mistake; the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed by an accident of this case by drinking, and the degree of interference with violence and official duties is not severe: The fact that there is a need for strict punishment for the crime of interference with the execution of official duties in order to establish the state's legal order and to eradicate the light of public authority.