logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.01.13 2016고단2567
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 3, 2016, around 00:50 on October 3, 2016, the Defendant deemed that police officers, such as the Jeju-dong Police Station D District E, etc. belonging to the Jeju-dong Police Station, regulate the drinking of alcohol at the entrance distance of C at Jeju-si on October 3, 2016.

Other locations Ga. Ga. Ga.) and Ga. Ga. Ha, who is solicited by the police officer to return home, “h si send its match;

It is why why we pay taxes, and why we see.

“The time limit was set” and the time limit was set.

Accordingly, the defendant, who is found to move a patrol vehicle, opens the back door of the patrol vehicle and enter it, and the situation in which the police officer restrains the patrol vehicle E;

p. Name and class b. Doz.

“Along with sound, the chest of the above police officer was assaulted twice by being pushed by his hand.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the crackdown on drinking by police officers who wear a uniform.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (the 31th page of investigation records);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines;

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Provisional Payment Order: The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the following circumstances:

The favorable circumstances: The fact that all facts of crime are recognized and discussed, the degree of interference with the performance of official duties is not serious, the fact that there is no criminal record and there is no record of crime except for punishment twice a fine. It is so decided as per Disposition by the reasons such as motive and circumstance of crime, circumstances after the crime, the defendant's occupation, age, and family relationship.

arrow