logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.11.26 2013고단2557
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, and for ten months, for each of the defendants B.

No. 1 of the seized evidence from the defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment for one year with labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Incheon District Court on December 22, 2010, and the suspended execution period becomes final and conclusive on December 30, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Fraud by Defendant A and Violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act;

A. Although the defrauded intentionally caused minor traffic accidents with wife F, etc. and did not have any injury to the point of receiving hospitalized treatment due to the above accident, the Defendant was hospitalized at a hospital, and then solicited the insurance company to “insurance fraud” or to receive insurance proceeds through “insurance fraud”, thereby having the said person make a false traffic accident, and solicited the said person to receive insurance proceeds from the insurance company by means of receiving part of the insurance proceeds.

At around 19:30 on May 31, 2010, the Defendant, F, and G recruited as above, and the Defendant intentionally caused a traffic accident by shocking the above test while driving the HHHHHHHHH passenger car on the front of the Bupyeong-gu Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan Bupyeong-gu 760 Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, while making a change in the course on the right side of the vehicle at the HHHHH HH passenger car and driving it on the right side of the bed.

Since then, after receiving an accident from the victim LIG Damage Insurance Co., Ltd., an insurance company of the above test car, the defendant, F, and G were hospitalized in the K Council, and they were hospitalized in the above insurance company, and made a false statement as if the normal traffic accident occurred to the officers in charge of the insurance company.

However, the above accident was an intentional accident for the defendant to receive insurance money by pretending to a traffic accident, and it was merely a minor injury due to the above accident and there was no need to be hospitalized.

As above, the Defendant is above.

arrow