logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.05.18 2017가단207047
부당이득금
Text

1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 30,024,160 and the interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from July 24, 2017 to the day of complete payment.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 12, 1989, the Defendant reported marriage between B and B, and reported divorce on September 3, 2010.

B. B, despite the fact that he intentionally caused a minor traffic accident with C, etc. and was not at the location of an injury to the point of receiving hospitalized treatment due to the said accident, B conspired to obtain insurance money from an insurance company by committing the so-called “insurance fraud,” which received insurance money by claiming insurance money from the insurance company on this basis after being hospitalized at the hospital, and thereby committing so-called “insurance fraud.” In the case of the crime of fraud, where approximately KRW 100 million was involved in the insurance fraud by intentionally using a traffic accident with the following specifications, and received the insurance money from the relevant insurance company, the Incheon District Court sentenced 2014Da1504, Dec. 25, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive at that time.

Details of insurance fraud

1. - On February 28, 2011, around 19:14, 201, Defendant D driven Defendant B, F, and C in front of Seocheon-dong, Seocheon-gu, Incheon, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Incheon, and caused traffic accidents by shocking the said Amburg vehicle, even though it was possible to prevent the accident from spreading due to its discovery and sufficient operation.

- Defendant D was hospitalized in each I Hospital for 17 days, and Defendant B was hospitalized in each I Hospital for 60 days, and was made a false statement as if he suffered injury due to normal traffic accidents.

However, the above accident was an intentional accident for the defendants to receive insurance money by pretending to a traffic accident, and it was merely a minor injury due to the above accident and there was no need to be hospitalized.

2. - Defendant D is a N-Aburt-Wur-Wur-Wurd-Wurd-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-Wing-W

arrow