1. The Defendants: (a) from April 11, 2017, Defendant B with respect to each of the said five million won and each of the said money to the Plaintiff; and (b) on April 201, 2017, Defendant C.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 31, 201, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant C on a commercial building located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu (hereinafter “instant building”) and entered into a new lease agreement with the said Defendant on December 31, 201 while engaging in the flowers Samping Private Teaching Institutes and the flower sale business in the said building.

B. A dispute arises between the Plaintiff, Defendant C, and Defendant C’s wife, and Defendant C. On September 24, 2015, Defendant C was sentenced to a fine of one million won for the following criminal facts from this court (2015cc. 304), and appealed on January 8, 2016 (this Court is dismissed on January 8, 2016). However, the second appeal was dismissed on July 14, 2016 (Supreme Court Decision 2016Do1566).

Defendant C is the owner of the instant building.

1. Around June 21, 2014, the Defendant threatened the Plaintiff in a way that the Plaintiff was able to take a bath at the E shop operated by the Plaintiff located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., with the Plaintiff’s face and chest as if the Plaintiff were to assault the Plaintiff, and as if the Plaintiff’s face and chest were to assault the Plaintiff, he/she displayed the Plaintiff’s face as if he/she assaulted, and threatened the Plaintiff in a way that “the Plaintiff was frighted” and “the Plaintiff was frighted.”

2. In around 20:00 on July 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) assaulted the Plaintiff’s chest at E stores operated by the Plaintiff located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) assaulted the Plaintiff’s chest by drinking it; and (c) caused the Plaintiff’s arms going to the entrance door up to the entrance, thereby causing the Defendant’s injury to the right-hand sprinking for treatment of fourteen (14) days in front of the entrance.

C. Around March 2017, Defendant B received a summary order of KRW 700,000 from this Court for the following criminal facts:

(2016 Highest No. 15502). The above Defendant claimed excessive premium in the above fireworks on April 16, 2014 on the ground that the Plaintiff, a lessee, demands excessive premium in front of the fireworks of the Plaintiff’s operation, which was located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, for the reason that the Plaintiff demanded excessive premium in front of the fireworks of the Plaintiff’s operation, and that the Plaintiff demand excessive premium in spite of the Plaintiff’s decrease in value by using a commercial building, is referred to as “the calculation of tax base within