logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.11.08 2017고정989
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On June 26, 2016, the summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant connects the Defendant’s house located in the Seocho-gu Seoul apartment to the Internet site D to the “E” at the Internet site’s office. The Defendant refers to the Victim F, namely, the Defendant’s complaint against the registration of continuous musical notice.

According to the title " "," the victim took a fluence of the language previously posted by the victim, and the expression "G Usle uses the fluoral expression "h" by pointing out the fluor "H", and does not seem to be a reflector (i) even though she expressed a gluorous bath and fluoral expression to a large number of people, he/she is under way to make a fluorous accusation and intimidation against the fluor who written a fluorous writing that does not have any desire and fluorous desire (ii) with the fluorous expression, "I wish to take part B)," and "I wish to take part in the fluoral expression" are abused as a crime of faceing his/her own mental and disease even after preparing an fluoral notice (iii). A notice is made by a person with a fluoral personality disorder who has sexual contact with him/her (iv).

However, this case’s notice was published by extracting only a part of the issue in the victim’s previous notice, and the victim’s expression of “H” rather than the expression of “homicide,” but rather did not make a brut complaint and intimidation against the victim, who prepared writing that did not have any desire and bruth, and did not abuse the situation and forces where the victim was receiving medical treatment to use it as a crime of anti-social and anti-human act. This case’s notice does not abuse the victim’s sexual contact with those who suffered from a frutal personality disorder.

arrow