Revocation, such as an order to refund expenses for workplace skill development training 2017Nu82378

1. A;

2. B

3. C.

4. D;

5. E.

6. F;

7. G.

8. H;

9. I

The head of the Central Local Labor Agency Gyeonggi-do Office

Suwon District Court Decision 2017Guhap62380 Decided October 19, 2017

March 15, 2018

April 5, 2018

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed. 2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The judgment of the first instance court is revoked. On March 30, 2016, the Defendant’s disposition to return the same amount as the Plaintiff’s illegal receipt and refund of KRW 1,019,00,00, and additional collection and refund of the same amount; disposition to return the amount of KRW 2,878,776, and additional collection and disposition to Plaintiff C; disposition to return the amount of KRW 2,144,508, and additional collection and disposition to Plaintiff C; disposition to return the same amount of KRW 795,076,000, and additional collection and refund to Plaintiff C; disposition to return the same amount of KRW 3,444,284, and additional collection and refund to Plaintiff E; disposition to return the same amount of KRW 945,943,00,000 granted to Plaintiff F; disposition to additionally collect the same amount of KRW 1,487,508, and disposition to return the same amount of KRW 2,516,715 and additional collection.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, other than the parts written by the court under paragraph (2) below. Thus, the grounds for appeal by the plaintiff under Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are cited as they are (the grounds for appeal by the plaintiff are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if all the evidence submitted in the court of first instance are examined, the fact-finding and the judgment of the

2. Parts to be dried;

A. On June 30, 2013, 201, 2013, 30, 2013, 201. (b) No. 5 of the first instance judgment, 21, 31, 2016, 300, 21, 21, 21, 21, 21, 21, 21, 21, 21, 21, 31, 21, 21, 5, 5, 51, 21, 21, 21, 21, 21, 31, 21, 21, 31, 21, 21, 31, 31, 21, 21, 21, 21, 31, 21, 31, 21, 30, 31, 31, 31, 2016, 31, 201, 2, 3.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed in its entirety due to the lack of reason, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed in its entirety. It is so decided as per Disposition.

The presiding judge, senior senior judge;

Judges Park Jong-young

Judges Lee Jong-hwan